Quantcast
Channel: File Services and Storage forum
Viewing all 13580 articles
Browse latest View live

Scale-Out File server Snapshot issue

$
0
0

Hi,

I have Configured a Failover cluster with two nodes running Server 2012 R2 that point to a common Scale-out File server storage location running 2012 R2. I have also enable the Fille server VSS Agent in roles. When try to take Snapshot of Scale Out file server I end up with error often.

Below are the random error I face when I run "Add volume \\scaleout\server" from diskshadow,

1. Error text: VSS_E_SNAPSHOT_SET_IN_PROGRESS

2. The provider does not support volume shadow copies for this volume in this context.

You must either change the context or add a different volume.

Note that changing the context might cause existing volumes in the shadow copy set to become unsupported.

I have installed all the hot fix to keep OS up to date. Please let me know what I am missing?


sharing folder

$
0
0
allow permission for read, write and save but deny delete for group members

Raid 1 on Win 10

$
0
0
 How to mirror a disk with three (3) partitions. (F,C,D)

Deny Format of Drives for Admins

$
0
0

Hi

We have multiple LUNs / Drives on Windows servers using as backup repositories. We removed all NTFS permissions from these drives except for System and backup works fine. Now our concern is to how to deny anyone including Admins to encrypt / format the disks (this happen before during a malware outbreak). If we get an option for this or a workaround for this issue, then it will be great.

Thanks in advance


LMS

DFSRs errors

$
0
0

Hello,

I found many errors on our event viewer related to DFS.
Do you know any solutions or what the possible error can be? 
When i check the disks they are all healthy. 

DFSRs (9420) \\.\D:\System Volume Information\DFSR\database_76D2_8381_D283_43F9\dfsr.db: A request to write to the file "\\.\D:\System Volume Information\DFSR\database_76D2_8381_D283_43F9\dfsr.db" at offset 1335164928 (0x000000004f950000) for 40960 (0x0000a000) bytes has not completed for 36 second(s). This problem is likely due to faulty hardware. Please contact your hardware vendor for further assistance diagnosing the problem.

DFSRs (9420) \\.\D:\System Volume Information\DFSR\database_76D2_8381_D283_43F9\dfsr.db: A request to write to the file "\\.\D:\System Volume Information\DFSR\database_76D2_8381_D283_43F9\dfsr.db" at offset 378175488 (0x00000000168a8000) for 32768 (0x00008000) bytes has not completed for 36 second(s). This problem is likely due to faulty hardware. Please contact your hardware vendor for further assistance diagnosing the problem

DFSRs (11080) \\.\D:\System Volume Information\DFSR\database_76D2_8381_D283_43F9\dfsr.db: A request to write to the file "\\.\D:\System Volume Information\DFSR\database_76D2_8381_D283_43F9\fsr.log" at offset 741376 (0x00000000000b5000) for 4096 (0x00001000) bytes succeeded, but took an abnormally long time (18 seconds) to be serviced by the OS. This problem is likely due to faulty hardware. Please contact your hardware vendor for further assistance diagnosing the problem.

EMC VMAX ENAS - SMB Signing is failing with Windows server 2012 r2 Active Directory

$
0
0

Hi Team,

SMBv3.0.2 signing request is failing on EMC VMAX ENAS  Storage which is joined Active directory(Windows server 2012 R2).

Kindly share if any of you have idea on this.

Regards,

Sanesh

Windows Server 2008 R2 not dispplaying folders

$
0
0

Hello Guys,

I would like a help. I got a problem today with my Windows Server 2008 R2.

We have a second hard drive called File Server and inside of that we have all of the folders that we need to share with people from our organization.

Since yesterday afternoon few people are not able to see their folders on the file server.

If they try to go from the menu in the left side of Windows Explorer they can see the folder, if they open the way File server in M:\ they cannot see the same folder over there.

I have tried to go to that way M:\ logged with my user (that has administrator permissions) directly in my Windows server (that we created the file server) and I am not able to see few folders too.

It is really crazy, the folders are there but it is not showing even if I tried to check from my Windows Server.

Already checked if the folders were hidden but I did not find anything.

Did a reset and all updates but also the folders are not showing.

Can anyone help us?

Best Regards,

Deivid Araujo

We

Properly configuring test environment for switching print servers from Production's "print2008" to dev "print2016"

$
0
0

Hello - sorry if this is the wrong forum, but since it deals with printers shared over SMB, I thought it might fit in the "file services" section.

We have 500 users using \\print2008 to print right now, so I can't just stand up the new machine, \\print2016 and immediately change our DNS server to have a CNAME pointing print2008 to the new print2016 machine until I'm sure everything works.

So I thought that perhaps I could use the hosts file on my office workstation to do a simple alias.

I stick:

<ip address> print2008
<ip address>print2008.fqdn

into the hosts file and just hope it will work.

However, sadly, none of my printers previously mapped to print2008 are working on my workstation post reboot. Whenever I try to print, I get a GUI-based "access is denied error" and in Event Viewer, I get the following:

The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server print2016$. The target name used was host/print2008. This indicates that the target server failed to decrypt the ticket provided by the client. This can occur when the target server principal name (SPN) is registered on an account other than the account the target service is using. Ensure that the target SPN is only registered on the account used by the server. This error can also happen if the target service account password is different than what is configured on the Kerberos Key Distribution Center for that target service. Ensure that the service on the server and the KDC are both configured to use the same password.

So, I'm guessing that for security's sake, print2016 is refusing to handle my requests because my workstation is offering them to print2008. I followed what instructions I was able to from here, like turning off StrictNameChecks and turning on DNSonWire. I also added the BackConnectionHostNames entry. Basically everything that didn't give me an error message, but I couldn't do the dreaded SPN record for kerberos authentication.... because of course, I get the "duplicate SPN found, aborting operation!" error.

Of course there's a duplicate SPN; print2008 is being used by 500 users!

If I was 100% sure that everything was working great on print2016 I'd go ahead and just make the changes in DNS, like adding the CNAME record that the link in the previous paragraph describes, but I can't riskanything happening to print2008 when it's in active use.

Can anyone recommend a good way to set up my testing environment so I can basically fool my workstation into being okay with sending "bad" kerberos tickets to print2016, and have print2016 be okay with accepting them?

Thanks.


Server 2016 File Ownership - How to keep it as "Administrators"

$
0
0
  1. I have a server where a service runs as a user and creates files.
    This account is under the Administrators Group (local).
  2. Later, other users under the local Administrators Group (local) need to modify, delete these files, but they can't because the user in step 1 still has ownership.
  3. I think with older servers (2008 R2) we were able to make sure no matter what the owner always remained "Administrators".
  4. How do I accomplish this in Server 2016?

S2D mixed with iSCSI SAN

$
0
0

Good morning,

We currently have a traditional Window  Server 2016 3-node Hyper-V Cluster with an iSCSI SAN. We are planning to purchase two additional nodes capable of support Storage Spaces Direct. We plan to storage migrate from the SAN to S2D. Can we add the two new nodes to the existing cluster, also giving them access to the SAN and then enable S2D on the two nodes? That would allow us to live migrate to the new servers in the cluster and then Storage migrate from the SAN to the S2D storage. We have taken a similar approach in the past with two SAN's,

Thanks

Linus



File is locked for editing by another user

$
0
0

Hello,

I have shared folder on file server which is used by many users.

If I try to open some Office or Excel file which is already opened by another user, I get message"<filename> is locked for editing by <user>" but in this message the <user> is not correct.

So the information that file is locked is correct.

But the information about user who locked the file is NOT correct.

What is the reason for that ?

Where can I check why exactly this user is written ?

Thanks.

User name does not match

$
0
0

Hi

We have Windows 2008 domain. Our file server is NetApp.

When a user tried to open a file on the file server, the user got the message something like "The file is opened by user A. You can only Read the file, you can not modify the file."

But in the file open files window on the file server, it showed user B who was opening the file. Actually user A's account has been disabled. User B is right person who was opening the file at that moment.

How come the user got the incorrect information about who was opening the file?

Please help!

Thanks in advance!


Grace

Faster SAN Performance Using Drive Letter

$
0
0

On Windows Server 2012 R2 (and reproduced on 2016), we see significantly faster performance from our SANs (both Compellent and SolidFire) when accessing files through a drive letter.  For example:

  1. Move-ClusterGroup to attach the storage
  2. Run WinDirStat against 43,484 directories under C:\BuildCluster\STORAGE\RootFolder: 1m 38s


Versus:

  1. Move-ClusterGroup to attach the storage
  2. Set-WmiInstance to assign a drive letter to C:\BuildCluster\STORAGE
  3. Run WinDirStat against 43,484 directories under Q:\RootFolder: 21s


Why would assigning a drive letter make file performance that much faster?  We'd actually prefer NOT to have to use a drive letter, but we can't argue against the performance gains.



iSCSI Initiator dive not formatting

$
0
0

I have created a volume on our Dell EQ.  I've added the target IP in the windows iSCSI Initiator.  The initiator connected and the volume is visible after clicking Auto Configure.  From windows I can see the disk from Windows Management console however when I try to create a new volume ReFS or NTFS I get "Failed to format volume - Invalid Parameter Activity ID: {b0e18171-777e-45ab-99a4-80c10c7a9e89}

I am not sure where to troubleshoot.

Thank you,

How to disable / decrease MPIO cache

$
0
0

Hi, 

Testing out a new backup repository.

I have a QNAP nas with 12disks. It's currently connected to my aruba switch via 2x1Gbit links. My backup server is physical with 4x10k raid5, Win2012r2. The backup server also is also connected to the same switch with 2x1Gb links.

QNAP is a iscsi target, and MPIO has been enabled on the backup server.

When I copy a 50GB test file from backup to QNAP, the progress bar shows the speed of 350MB/s, which is impossible. After progress bar shows that the file is copied (after ~3mins), a good portion of the file is still in the memory of the backup server and both two nics are still transferring ~1Gbps for about two minutes after the file was supposed to be copied over. You can see the memory consumption first rising by 20GB, and then slowly lowering back to normal. In the receiving end the QNAP shows transfer speed of 200MB/s during whole time. 

Is there a some kind of built-in caching in MPIO? Is there way to disable, or significantly lower the amount of cache?


E: In devmgmt -> disk drives -> QNAP iSCSI Storage Multi-Path disk Device -> policies "Enable write caching on the device" is not checked.

0x80070570: The file or directory is corrupted and unreadable.

$
0
0
This is on Server 2012 R2
I have a file that it is stored on a storage pool, space is parity and I'm getting the following error when trying to move/copy/open it:
0x80070570: The file or directory is corrupted and unreadable.
I have run full scan on boot, Repair-Volume cmdlet, SFC.
Nothing can see this file as corrupt except when I try to access it.
How can I repair this file? Isn't parity supposed to prevent this?
The corrupts bits should be able to be repaired if the OS would just recognize it. 

NTFS permission removed when deleting a subfolder

$
0
0

Hello everyone,

I do have a very strange issue with my file server. Let me first describe the infrastructure.

OS: Windows Server 2016
Roles: File and Storage Services
Type: Member of a 2016 Domain

On the file server I do have to following structure/permission:

  • F:\
    • ANWDTest
      • ZZZ
        • DIMS
        • Wagenbuch

The NTFS permissions to those folders is like that:

  • ANWDTest
    Inheritance disabled
    CREATOR OWNER - Full control - Subfolders and files only
    SYSTEM - Full control - This folder, subfolders and files
    Administrators - Full control - This folder, subfolders and files
    L_NTFS_J_R - Read & execute - This folder only

  • ZZZ
    Inheritance enabled
    L_NTFS_J_ZZZ_R - Read & execute - This folder only

  • DIMS
    Inheritance enabled
    L_NTFS_J_ZZZ_DIMS_R - Read & execute - This folder, subfolders and files
    L_NTFS_J_ZZZ_DIMS_W - Modify - This folder, subfolders and files

  • Wagenbuch
    Inheritance enabled
    L_NTFS_J_ZZZ_Wagenbuch_R - Read & execute - This folder, subfolders and files
    L_NTFS_J_ZZZ_Wagenbuch_W - Modify - This folder, subfolders and files

So far I think this is nothing special, now here is my issue:

When I delete the "Wagenbuch" or the "DIMS" folder this does remove the group "L_NTFS_J_ZZZ_R" from the "ZZZ" folder AND does remove the group "L_NTFS_J_R" from the "ANWDTest" folder... and I do have absolutly no idea why this is happening.

Does anyone see an error in the setup or did face similar issues? I am totally lost here, even no idea where to start searching.. Google did also not help at all.

Thanks for the support!


UPDATE 1: To be sure that is not an issue of our file server - I did setup the same structure on an other 2016 server, and did face the same issue.

UPDATE 2: In the meantime I did the same setup on a 2012 R2 server and there is no issue at all, so this seems to be related to Server 2016.

UPDATE 3: I just did a test setup of the brand new 2019 server - I do have the exact same error as on server 2016.

(Error 0x80070035) Network Path Was Not Found

$
0
0

Hi All, I am getting a "Error code: 0x80070035 The network path was not found" message while accessing a SMB share from Windows 2012 R2 and Windows 2008 R2 systems.  We are able to access it successfully from Windows 7 and 10  systems.  I have looked at the other posts related to this topic on Technet and having tried all suggestions , i am still not able to access.

I have also read this Microsoft KB but it doesn't say how to enable SMBv1 and 2  for Windows 2012 R2 or 2008 R2 smb-clients. It instead talks about smb-servers .  Is it the same procedure then for client & server 2012R2/2008R2 both  ?

Things i have verified 

-Not a network issue or ACL issue. The file-server is in the same subnet

-Not a DNS issue. I am able to nslookup and ping the File-server name.

- It is not a permissions issue. The share is open to Everyone.

- No antivirus is running.

-On Windows 10 systems i had to enable SMBv1 support and only then i was able to access that share.

-On Windows 2012 R2 and 20082 systems, i have verified SMB1 and SMB2 are running/enabled by running the following commands:

Get-WindowsOptionalFeature–Online –FeatureName SMB1Protocol

Get-WindowsOptionalFeature–Online –FeatureName SMB2Protocol

sc.exe config lanmanworkstation depend= bowser/mrxsmb10/mrxsmb20/nsi
sc.exe config mrxsmb10 start= auto

sc.exe config lanmanworkstation depend= bowser/mrxsmb10/mrxsmb20/nsi
sc.exe config mrxsmb20 start= auto

I also rebooted our servers after running the above sc.exe commands.

What else can someone recommend?  Thanks in advance









Server 2019 S2D Nested Resiliency - Storage Pool Quorum

$
0
0

On this page - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/storage-spaces/nested-resiliency - a scenario is detailed where a 2-node S2D cluster loses one entire node plus a disk on the second node. This results in 3 out of 8 of the clusters disks remaining online. The S2D quorum documentation - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/storage-spaces/understand-quorum - still indicates that to maintain storage pool quorum a cluster must have 50% + 1 disks available (with the pool resource owner counting as a disk vote). This is definitely the case in Server 2016... was this changed in Server 2019 and not documented? How does Storage Pool Quorum work in S2D on Server 2019 that it allows this nested resiliency failure scenario?

Thank you.

Issues with server access that seems to be related to Shadow Copy

$
0
0

We are experiencing issues with server access that seems to be related to Shadow Copy. This is being seen multiple servers with anywhere from 20 to 35TB of storage at least 10TB of data on the data drive. I have been able to reproduce what I am seeing on Server 2012, Server 2016 and Server 2008.

Here is a description of what I am seeing. We have a Shadow Copy run at noon. A little after 12:05 we see access to the server appear to freeze. This goes on for about 3 to 5 minutes. During this time copy jobs, processes being run on the server and even trying to delete small files will halt/pause. Sometimes processes will crash, and we are seeing copy jobs fail as well. We will often run processes that take days to complete and copy jobs are often of multiple terabytes. It looks to me that the actual Shadow Copy job has completed when we see the freezing. That is my assumption because when I look at the Shadow Copy job in Computer Management it shows a time of 10:05 for the current job which I am assuming is the time the Shadow Copy itself completed.

In reading about Shadow Copy it does say that during the process it will freeze files in order ready the file system, but if I understand correctly that should happen at the beginning of the process and should only last few seconds and should not be allowed to last longer the 60 seconds.

During the Shadow Copy process the write I/O request remain frozen but should the process should only last 10 seconds

So I am wondering if there is an issue with the way Shadow copy is completing its task or if maybe this is to be expected due to the quantity of data on the servers.


Viewing all 13580 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>