Previous Versions, and VSS Error 12289 hr = 0x80070001, Incorrect function.

June 18, 2018, 4:47 am

≫ Next: Capacity incorrectly displayed on NFS client when quotas are set for NFS share on server

Click on Configure Shadow Copies, click on settings for either \\?\Volume or C:\ then settings then details.

I receive following error: Failed to Initialize the details dialog for Volume C:\

following event is logged in Event Viewer:

Log Name: Application
Source: VSS
Date: 2018/06/18 1:32:45 PM
Event ID: 12289
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer:

Description:
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Unexpected error DeviceIoControl(\\?\Volume{c777aa95-6573-4c04-b22a-7559a7e1e661} - 00000000000003A0,0x00530024,0000000000000000,0,000002C9133088F0,4096,[0]). hr = 0x80070001, Incorrect function.
.

Operation:
Query diff areas on this volume

Context:
Volume Name: \\?\Volume{0f0ab4aa-2ce9-4d15-8104-842f4934d330}\

Ahmed

↧

Capacity incorrectly displayed on NFS client when quotas are set for NFS share on server

August 30, 2018, 12:16 pm

≫ Next: Determine whether a request came directly to a share or via a DFS referral

≪ Previous: Previous Versions, and VSS Error 12289 hr = 0x80070001, Incorrect function.

Hi I've found that when setting hard limit quotas on a Windows server 2016 (clustered), an SMB share size will correctly be displayed on the SMB client. Meaning a 221GB volume with a 300MB hard limit quota on an SMB share will be displayed as a 300MB mount volume on the SMB client.

However, on an NFS share, the NFS client will see the mounted share with the full volume size instead of the hard limit size.If I write beyond the 300MB limit, the client will get an error about disk full. Therefore I know the quota is indeed enabled. Its just not displaying correctly on the NFS client.

Here is the 300MB quota hard limit set for my NFS share called nfsalias

On both Windows and Linux NFS clients incorrectly sees the full 221GB volume size. I expected it to see the the hard limit quota size of 300MB.

Windows:

Linux:

Is this a known limitation with Windows Server?

↧

Determine whether a request came directly to a share or via a DFS referral

August 30, 2018, 2:18 pm

≫ Next: Resizing Partitions in windows 7

≪ Previous: Capacity incorrectly displayed on NFS client when quotas are set for NFS share on server

So I have a reverse version of a question I see posted here quite often. I see a lot of people ask how to find out where a DFS referral is pointing them, or which server is being used, but what I would like to know is if there is a way to determine whether a request to a server came via a DFS redirect or not.

For example. Let's say you have a share on \\server1\share mapping toc:\share, and a domain DFS set up at \\contoso.com\share that has a folder target pointing to\\server1\share. When looking on the computer management for the server, I can see open files forc:\share.

But is there a way to determine whether a client accessed the file directly via\\server1\share\file.txt or via \\contoso.com\share\file.txt ?

Thanks!
Jeffe

↧

Resizing Partitions in windows 7

August 30, 2018, 11:01 pm

≫ Next: Moving fileserver with folder redirection and offline files enabled not working as expected

≪ Previous: Determine whether a request came directly to a share or via a DFS referral

i would like to know whether we can resize Drive E and F partitions in windows 7... I have read and watched many times about resizing of C or D partition but it does not work for E and F partitions...My D drive is too large and would like to shrink it and add to E or F partitions...Need your help..thanks

↧

Moving fileserver with folder redirection and offline files enabled not working as expected

August 30, 2018, 11:37 pm

≫ Next: Cannot access shared drive when folder name consists of particular CHN char

≪ Previous: Resizing Partitions in windows 7

Hello,

We need to change the fileserver where folder redirection files are currently hosted, lets call it Server1. We have also enabled offline sync for all these files (desktop,docs,pics etc). So files are now redirected to \\server1\userfiles\%username%. When I look at the computer CSC folder it shows one namespace "server1"

Now I've followed the following guide https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/folder-redirection/enable-optimized-moving that says to enable "optimized" move of contents in offline caches. Well I did and then blocked my test user from accessing the fileshare so new files would stay in offline cache and not be synced to the server. I created some files to synced folders on the test computer. Then I robocopied the data to new fileserver "server2". Then changed the GP settings of folder redirection and offline files to reflect the new share. After that forced gpupdate on the computer, logged off and logged in.

All files that I created after blocking access to old share were gone. All files were online and the sync center started to download all the files to new offline cache. Now the CSC folder shows server1 and server2. It seems it is not renamed as said in the Microsoft guide. Is anyone else seeing this behavior and is there any alternative way to do this without risking data loss while doing the move? Also the "move contents to new location" setting wont work because there is like hundreds of gigabytes of data and login times would be hours.

↧

Cannot access shared drive when folder name consists of particular CHN char

August 24, 2018, 3:11 am

≫ Next: Replacing Raid 1 mirrored drives on Windows Server 2003x64

≪ Previous: Moving fileserver with folder redirection and offline files enabled not working as expected

Hi,

Full path on server D:\shared_e\home\admin bill\ang\港

Share path : \\TESTAD01\home\admin bill\ang\港

OS : Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard

The shared folder is not accessible with this particular Chinese character on a client machine. We tried replacing with another character, the shared drive is accessible. However, the folder is accessible from the server.

The Fonts have been applied on the server as well as on the client machine.

Any advice on what can cause this issue is greatly appreciated.

↧

Replacing Raid 1 mirrored drives on Windows Server 2003x64

September 3, 2009, 9:18 am

≫ Next: How to remove disks from Primordial Pool of an S2D deployment?

≪ Previous: Cannot access shared drive when folder name consists of particular CHN char

I have looked almost everywhere for the proper sequence to replace mirrored drives. The drives are getting old but still healthy we just want to replace them with new hard drives, has anyone actually done this? Only 2 drives 0 and 1. SCSI Ultra 320 in a 6 drive bay. Software mirroring with Windows Server Disk Management. I would appreciate the proper steps for removing, remirroring a drive, rebooting with the new drive and remirroring the other new drive. Just don't want to harm the drives already running in case they need to be put back in the system

↧

How to remove disks from Primordial Pool of an S2D deployment?

August 31, 2018, 4:41 am

≫ Next: DFSR move to new folder

≪ Previous: Replacing Raid 1 mirrored drives on Windows Server 2003x64

Executed this to disable auto addition of disks to the Storage Pool.

Get-StorageSubSystem Cluster* | Set-StorageHealthSetting -Name "System.Storage.PhysicalDisk.AutoPool.Enabled" -Value False

Then the sequence of steps is in order

Created a Two Node Cluster with two disks on each node.
Enabled S2D and application deployed…
Added third Node to the cluster (again with two disks) but the intention is not to put the disks into S2D and keep them locally available. But somehow the disks from the new node fall under the Primordial Pool;

Please let me know for how to get them out & assign to the box as local?

yup

↧

DFSR move to new folder

August 31, 2018, 2:37 am

≫ Next: How to confirm if DPM agent is pointing to the correct DPM server?

≪ Previous: How to remove disks from Primordial Pool of an S2D deployment?

Hello,

I have to move the DFSR folders from one drive to another. I have found a guide and another explaining how to do it. I have followed the guide - robocopy the files, move the share, compare the sizes, move the DFRS; but was getting thethis member is waiting for initial replication for replicated folder message. 4 hours later, as the message was still appearing, I have then run a command to

dfsradmin Membership Set /RGName:<replication group name> /RFName:<replicated folder name> /MemName:<primary member> /IsPrimary:True

elect the primary node and the replication began. As a primary I have used the node with the drive swap. When I came this morning, I noticed that there is a lot of data missing in the folder, about 350gb to be exact. I checked the DfsrPrivate folder and there is 2000 files in the ConflictAndDeleted. I have also checked the other 2 members, but there is not data there either.<o:p></o:p>

I need to move one more folder, but wit the data containg all users private info, so the last thing I want to do is loos the files.

I would like to know if there is something I have done incorrectly. Should’ve I selected a different primary node? If I run the command now to see the primary, there isn’t one again…

Also, what has happened to the data?

Thanks,

Peter

↧

How to confirm if DPM agent is pointing to the correct DPM server?

August 31, 2018, 10:18 am

≫ Next: Recover corrupted .bkf file by SysTools BKF Repair.

≪ Previous: DFSR move to new folder

How to confirm if DPM agent is pointing to the correct DPM server? and if it is pointing to the wrong server, how to point it to the correct one without re-install of the agent?

This is for Windows Server 2008 R2 and DPM is on Server 2012 R2, DPM vision 4.2

Thanks,

↧

Recover corrupted .bkf file by SysTools BKF Repair.

February 2, 2010, 10:56 pm

≫ Next: server 2016, hyper-v, dedupe

≪ Previous: How to confirm if DPM agent is pointing to the correct DPM server?

Hi All,

My .bkf file corrupted due to power failure, and now i bought SysTools BKF Repair to retrieve the data from .bkf files. Theare are a few catalogs, say Catalog 1 and Catalog 2, in the corrupted .bkf files, and for some unknown reason the SysTools always loads the same catalog (Catalog 1), but really i want to load Catalog 2, so i deleted the Catalog 1 in the corrupted .bkf file, however SysTools is still loading up Catalog 1 even i deleted it in the .bkf file.

Can someone in here plz shed me a light will be much appreciated.

↧

server 2016, hyper-v, dedupe

September 1, 2018, 2:16 pm

≫ Next: ssd for cache and ssd for performance tier in S2D cluster

≪ Previous: Recover corrupted .bkf file by SysTools BKF Repair.

where is the documentation stating what storage is supported for hyper-v deduplication ?

looking at running RDSH (session host) VMs. Which I believer falls under the VDI category ?

I've read that you cant use local disk on the hyper-v box for storage tho and it's meant to be presented off of another windows server... ? why? in testing it works fine

↧

ssd for cache and ssd for performance tier in S2D cluster

August 16, 2018, 7:40 am

≫ Next: DFSR Replication failed

≪ Previous: server 2016, hyper-v, dedupe

Hi I have plan to build s2d two node cluster with 4x 800 12gb SAS Write intensive SSD for cache, 2x960 GB SATA mixed use for performance tier and 10x 2.4 TB SAS 10k for capacity. It's possible to have such scenario. Is it supported?

Thank you OOSOO

↧

DFSR Replication failed

September 2, 2018, 11:02 pm

≫ Next: File Server Resource Manager

≪ Previous: ssd for cache and ssd for performance tier in S2D cluster

I have two servers. The 'upstream' server is getting Database errors for the L: drive. It was still doing the initial replication and has about 4 TB left to go. The drive has free space.

I ran "chkdsk L: /scan /perf" and it did not find errors. The drive still has about 5 TB free. I restarted the DFSR service but I get the same errors.

Do i need to delete the entire Replication Group? I have four other replicated folders with normal status according to the diagnostic report.

The upstream server is getting the database errors:

Event ID: 2104

The DFS Replication service failed to recover from an internal database error on volume L:. Replication has been stopped for all replicated folders on this volume.

Additional Information:
Error: 9214 (Internal database error (-1078))
Volume: 0C96D29E-094C-4EEC-A5AE-56FB1EBAA71D
Database: L:\System Volume Information\DFSR

Event ID: 2004

The DFS Replication service stopped replication on volume L:. This failure can occur because the disk is full, the disk is failing, or a quota limit has been reached. This can also occur if the DFS Replication service encountered errors while attempting to stage files for a replicated folder on this volume.

Additional Information:
Error: 9014 (Database failure)
Volume: 0C96D29E-094C-4EEC-A5AE-56FB1EBAA71D

Event ID: 902 (in the application log)

DFSRs (3932) \\.\L:\System Volume Information\DFSR\database_3A2A_E257_2AE2_FA5\dfsr.db: The database engine detected multiple threads illegally using the same database session to perform database operations.
SessionId: 0x000000C340744420
Session-context: 0x00000000
Session-context ThreadId: 0x0000000000000FA4
Current ThreadId: 0x000000000000152C
Session-trace:
32997@6:04:07 PM

Event ID 302

DFSRs (3932) \\.\L:\System Volume Information\DFSR\database_3A2A_E257_2AE2_FA5\dfsr.db: The database engine has successfully completed recovery steps.

↧

File Server Resource Manager

August 25, 2013, 9:56 pm

≫ Next: How to reduce size of WinSXS folder

≪ Previous: DFSR Replication failed

Hello,

I have an issue in FSRM, that is that i cant view quota managed folders. when i click it displays "An unexpected error has occured. Check with application evemt log"

As checked the App log, it shows as below.

An unexpected error occurred in the File Server Resource Manager MMC snap-in
   at Microsoft.Storage.SrmMmc.QuotaDataCache.Enumerate(RemoteManager remoteManager, SrmDataCacheEnumEventHandler EventHandler, Int32 BatchSize)
   at Microsoft.Storage.SrmMmc.QuotasDisplayArea.EnumerateItemsIntoListView()
   at Microsoft.Storage.SrmMmc.DisplayArea.SafeEnumerateItemsIntoListView()
Access is denied. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 (E_ACCESSDENIED))
   at Microsoft.Storage.IFsrmQuotaManager.EnumQuotas(String Path, _FsrmEnumOptions options)
   at Microsoft.Storage.SrmMmc.QuotaDataCache.Enumerate(RemoteManager remoteManager, SrmDataCacheEnumEventHandler EventHandler, Int32 BatchSize)

Anyone Pls help me to get this sorted out. Several quota's has created and allocated to shared folders, which should not be affeted during troubleshooting.

Tanks,

Mifthah

↧

How to reduce size of WinSXS folder

September 3, 2018, 8:12 am

≫ Next: Windows Server 2016 Domain admin permission issue

≪ Previous: File Server Resource Manager

Hello,

Server is running SBS2011 based on Server 2008R2. C: drive is 60GB with 5GB free space. The C:\windows\winsxs folder is 18GB with folders dating back to year 2009. Is there a safe way to reduce the size of this folder by getting rid of old data that will never be needed?

Thanks,

↧

Windows Server 2016 Domain admin permission issue

July 24, 2018, 2:42 pm

≫ Next: An error was detected on device \Device\Harddisk3\DR3 during a paging operation. - The driver detected a controller error on \Device\Harddisk3\DR7

≪ Previous: How to reduce size of WinSXS folder

Hi all,

I'm having a weird issue in Server 2016 in regard to share and NTFS permissions.

When I create a folder on my file server (D: partition) and I change nothing, I can access all the folders and files in it. If, however, I disable inheritance to modify the permissions and change the share and NTFS permissions, I get an error (as local and domain admin) that I can not access the folder, I get a prompt and when I choose continue it adds the specific account (which is either local or domain admin) to the NTFS permissions. The share and NTFS permissions are as follows:

Share:
User group - Modify
Domain admins - Full Control

NTFS:
User group - Modify
Administrators - Full Control*
Domain Admins - Full control

* It doesn't matter whether I only give permissions to Administrators (of which domain admins is a member) or Domain Admins when I'm logged into a domain admin account.

The ownership of the folder does not influence anything as well, even when my account owns the folder I still get the prompt. When I change the the owner of the folder to, for instance the domain admins, I'm all of a sudden kicked out of it altogether (even though my account is a domain admin).

Turning off UAC does not change anything either. Neither does re-adding the server to the domain, nor does formatting the harddisk (as the issue can be recreated on multiple drives).

My other server 2016, in the same domain, also has this issue. Yet another server, also a Server 2016, in another domain which I'm administrator of doesn't have this issue at all. I have even recreated the domain in order to check whether the issue is domain related, this turns out not to be the case.
Does anyone else have similar problems with NTFS permissions not being applied properly? Is this a known bug in 2016 after a specific update?

If anyone has any tips, I'd very much appreciate the help.

Kind regards,

Ranko

Edit: I've tried SFC as well, did not help. Clean install of Windows did not help either (it was being updated right after the installation, so I can not rule out a bug due to an update).

↧

An error was detected on device \Device\Harddisk3\DR3 during a paging operation. - The driver detected a controller error on \Device\Harddisk3\DR7

January 19, 2014, 8:03 am

≫ Next: FSRM- Email Notification is not working

≪ Previous: Windows Server 2016 Domain admin permission issue

How can i ensure that the harddisk3 designation is relatd with USB etxernal disk?

I have several erros in LOGs:

An error was detected on device \Device\Harddisk3\DR3 during a paging operation.

and

The driver detected a controller error on \Device\Harddisk3\DR7

All times are HardDisk3 and sometimes it references to DR3 and sometimes DR7

My disk structure is:

2 RAID5 arrays fomr the same disks (80GB and 2 TB)

and USB 2 TB External hard disk with several partitions

I´m 99% sure that the error is related to the external USB disk and the Dell DIag tool shows no problems with any component

DISKPART> list disk

Disk ### Status         Size     Free     Dyn Gpt
-------- ------------- ------- ------- --- ---
Disk 0    Online           80 GB      0 B
Disk 1    Online         2711 GB      0 B        *
Disk 2    Online         1862 GB 1024 KB

DISKPART> sele disk 0

Disk 0 is now the selected disk.

DISKPART> detail disk

DELL PERC H700 SCSI Disk Device
Disk ID: 6EFE3928
Type : RAID
Status : Online
Path : 1
Target : 0
LUN ID : 0
Location Path : PCIROOT(0)#PCI(0400)#PCI(0000)#RAID(P01T00L00)
Current Read-only State : No
Read-only : No
Boot Disk : Yes
Pagefile Disk : Yes
Hibernation File Disk : No
Crashdump Disk : Yes
Clustered Disk : No

Volume ### Ltr Label        Fs     Type        Size     Status     Info
---------- --- ----------- ----- ---------- ------- --------- --------
Volume 3         System Rese NTFS   Partition    100 MB Healthy    System
Volume 4     C   DISCO        NTFS   Partition     79 GB Healthy    Boot

DISKPART> sele disk 1

Disk 1 is now the selected disk.

DISKPART> detail disk

DELL PERC H700 SCSI Disk Device
Disk ID: {A42559A8-43EF-4570-B4CF-336A22A718BF}
Type : RAID
Status : Online
Path : 1
Target : 1
LUN ID : 0
Location Path : PCIROOT(0)#PCI(0400)#PCI(0000)#RAID(P01T01L00)
Current Read-only State : No
Read-only : No
Boot Disk : No
Pagefile Disk : No
Hibernation File Disk : No
Crashdump Disk : No
Clustered Disk : No

Volume ### Ltr Label        Fs     Type        Size     Status     Info
---------- --- ----------- ----- ---------- ------- --------- --------
Volume 5         DADOS        NTFS   Partition   2711 GB Healthy
    C:\DADOS\

DISKPART> sele disk 2

Disk 2 is now the selected disk.

DISKPART> detail disk

HP External HDD USB Device
Disk ID: 000904F0
Type : USB
Status : Online
Path : 0
Target : 0
LUN ID : 0
Location Path : UNAVAILABLE
Current Read-only State : No
Read-only : No
Boot Disk : No
Pagefile Disk : No
Hibernation File Disk : No
Crashdump Disk : No
Clustered Disk : No

Volume ### Ltr Label        Fs     Type        Size     Status     Info
---------- --- ----------- ----- ---------- ------- --------- --------
Volume 6         SOFTWARE     NTFS   Partition    300 GB Healthy
    C:\DADOS\DISCO-EXTRA\
Volume 7         TEMPORARIO- NTFS   Partition    148 GB Healthy
    C:\DADOS\NEW_TRANSF\TEMPORARIO\
Volume 8         TRANSF_LIXO NTFS   Partition    149 GB Healthy
    C:\DADOS\NEW_TRANSF\TRANSF_LIXO\
Volume 9     R   RESTORE      NTFS   Partition   1264 GB Healthy

↧